Just want to drop a little opinion I have on the whole matter, without knowing Vic's true intentions as a person. However, at the job I work, I did have a particular coworker that I had to consistently manage due to a very similar problem. I know him personally, and know how he can get with his attention for women, but I knew the guy wasn't a predator with his antics in touching, hugging and even kissing random people and coworkers. He saw it more as a feminine expression to immediately cross boundaries and form connections with people through very close and personal touches that were definitely a topic of conversation I had to routinely discipline him on. I see a lot of the same argument in Vic's tweets and responses to the allegations as he did: emotional expression, spreading love, and being raised with that sense of "being open and true with everyone".
Which is why I have a problem with his supporters: regardless of whether or not he is a predator too, the ideology he is even trying to encourage is a literal cancer on society. You are not supposed to be open and form quick emotional attachments to everyone you meet: that is blatantly unsafe and forcing yourself onto someone without consent on an emotional level. Hiding the message under "spread love" or "the world needs more love in it" is stupid ignorance that harms even the basic principles of human interaction. There are plenty of people who believe in it, and will blindly support it enough to raise their kids in the toxic ideology.
So simply put, even if he's not a rapist, then he frankly represents a big problem in misguided desire to spread positivity in the world. Like a Christian shoving their beliefs down your throat (ironic, since he probably does that too), they are forcing themselves onto you with how they view things rather than respecting your boundaries. Given that the practice is a practically the same concept as rape and while I personally can say that my coworker would likely never cross that line, I don't find it hard to believe that Vic isn't* above committing the sexual version of it as well.
Which is why I have a problem with his supporters: regardless of whether or not he is a predator too, the ideology he is even trying to encourage is a literal cancer on society. You are not supposed to be open and form quick emotional attachments to everyone you meet: that is blatantly unsafe and forcing yourself onto someone without consent on an emotional level. Hiding the message under "spread love" or "the world needs more love in it" is stupid ignorance that harms even the basic principles of human interaction. There are plenty of people who believe in it, and will blindly support it enough to raise their kids in the toxic ideology.
So simply put, even if he's not a rapist, then he frankly represents a big problem in misguided desire to spread positivity in the world. Like a Christian shoving their beliefs down your throat (ironic, since he probably does that too), they are forcing themselves onto you with how they view things rather than respecting your boundaries. Given that the practice is a practically the same concept as rape and while I personally can say that my coworker would likely never cross that line, I don't find it hard to believe that Vic isn't* above committing the sexual version of it as well.