~ Z ~ said:The man who has everything to lose would win. This is no question in my opinion. I see things like this.
Man B has everything to lose (In this case, his family) vs. Man A who has nothing to lose.
Man B has pretty much every reason to fight to the death to protect his family. That alone should be enough for anyone with any reason to fight to their fullest, regardless of strength or not. He has every reason to fight with all his might and all his endurance. I mean... his friggin' family is on the line. This one should be pretty obvious.
Now, Man A is left with two options: Fight and kill the man or lose. What's the reward for doing either action? Nothing. Think of it like this: If Man A wins, he gets nothing, if he loses, he gets nothing. Either way, he will get nothing. Nothing gained nothing lost. Why is this important? If he lost it wouldn't change anything so what difference would it make in the fight?
So it all comes down to this: Guy who's family's about to get killed vs. A guy who had a bad day... Who do YOU think is gonna fight to their fullest potential without adding some extra stuff to what is presented?